All Issue

2021 Vol.9, Issue 2 Preview Page

Research Article

June 2021. pp. 127-143
Abstract
최근 급변하는 조직구조와 불확실성으로 대변되는 작금의 현대사회에서 공공기관 조직구성원들의 역할은 날로 중요시되고 있다. 특히, 공공부문에서 정해진 전통적 ‧ 공식적 업무를 넘어 보상체계와 관계없는 유연한 환경대처 능력을 기반으로 이타적이며 자발적인 혁신행동을 강조하는 협력적 조직시민행동에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 조직시민행동 활성화와 이를 저해하는 변인에 대한 긍정적 영향과 부정적 영향으로 변수를 이분화 하여 조직시민행동을 저해시키는 조직정치지각(POPS)과 이를 증진시키는 상사부하 교환관계(LMX)에 대한 두 가지 변수 및 각 차원 하위변수를 검증하였다. 먼저, 조직정치지각(POPS) 및 이에 대한 하위 변수로 이익지향 정치행위, 승진정책 둘째, 상사부하 교환관계(LMX) 및 이에 대한 하위변수로 정서적 유대감, 헌신, 공헌의욕, 지적존경에 대해 분석하였다. 분석결과 조직정치지각(POPS) 및 이익지향 정치행위는 부(-)의 영향으로 실증 되었으며, 상사부하 교환관계(LMX) 및 헌신, 공헌의욕은 정(+)의 영향으로 가설이 검증되었다.
The role of public organization members is becoming important in the modern society, which is represented by rapidly changing organizational structure and uncertainty. In particular, there is a growing interest in cooperative organizational citizenship behaviour that emphasizes altruistic and voluntary innovative behaviour based on flexible environmental coping ability that is not related to compensation system beyond traditional and official tasks set in the public sector. In this study, the perception of organizational politics (POPS) that inhibits organizational citizenship behaviour by dividing the variables into positive and negative influences on the activation of organizational citizenship behaviour and the variables that inhibit it and the Leader-Member exchange (LMX) that promotes it Two variables and sub-variables of each dimension were verified. First, perception of organizational politics (POPS) and its sub-variables, profit-oriented political behaviour, and promotion policy. Second, Leader-Member exchange (LMX) and its sub-variables were affect, loyalty, contribution, and professional respect. As a result of the analysis, on the perception of organizational politics (POPS) and profit-oriented political behaviour were verified as negative (-), and the hypotheses were verified under the influence of positive (+) on the Leader-Member exchange (LMX) between Leader-Member exchange (LMX), loyalty, and contribution.
References
  1. 문형구, 김경석, "조직시민행동(OCB) 연구에 대한 비판적 고찰: 한국에서의 연구를 중심으로", 경영학연구, 제35권 제2호, pp.609-643, 2006.
  2. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R., "Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers trust in leaders, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors", Leadership Quartery, Vol. 1, pp. 107-142, 1990.https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  3. 김종관, 윤준섭, 이영남 "인사공정성이 종업원의 혁신행동과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향", 인적자원관리학회, 제20권 제1호, pp.178-188, 2013.
  4. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A., "Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing", Research on Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, pp. 175-208, 1987.
  5. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J., "A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 13, pp. 46-78, 1975.https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
  6. 이종찬, "상사의 배려행동, 상사-부하 간 교환관계가 조직시민행동 및 성과 평가인식에 미치는 영향", 대한경영학회지, 제22권 제5호, pp.2979-2998, 2005.
  7. Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B., & Novak, M. A., "When Managers Decide Not to Decide Autocratically. An Investigation of Leader-Member Exchange and Decision Influence", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 8, pp. 579-584, 1986.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.579
  8. Folger, R., "Justice, motivation, and performance beyond role requirement", Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 239-248, 1993.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419447
  9. Vigoda, E., "The relationship between organizational politics, job attitudes, and work outcomes: Exploration and implications for the public sector", Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 57, pp. 326-347, 2000.https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1742
  10. Lewin, W., "The agglutination and complement-fixation tests in the diagnosis of a group of typhoid fever cases", South African Medical Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 45-50, 1936.
  11. 최장용, "조직정치지각과 조직시민행동의 관계에 관한 연구: 정치적 기술, 조직시민행동의 동기요인, LMX의 조절효과를 중심으로", 서울대학교 대학원, 석사학위 논문, 2010.
  12. Bief & Motowidlo, "How organizational rewards and organizational justice affect the organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior: analysis of pakistan service industries", City University Research Journal, Special Issue: AIC, pp. 171-182, 1986.
  13. Smith, C. A., D. W. Organ, & J. P. Near, "Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, pp. 655-663, 1983.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
  14. Borman, W. C., "The concept of organizational citizenship", Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 238-241, 2004.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00316.x
  15. Bateman., Organ, "Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee "Citizenship"", The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 587-595, 1983.https://doi.org/10.2307/255908
  16. Organ, D. W., "Organization citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time", Human Performance, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 85-97, 1987.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
  17. Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J., "Expanding the Criterion Domain? A Quantitative Review of the OCB Literature", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 555-566, 2007.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.555PMid:17371100
  18. Organ, D. W., "Issues in organization and management series. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome", Lexington Books, 1988.
  19. LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E., "The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 52-65, 2002.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52PMid:11916216
  20. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E., "Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors", Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 601-617, 1991.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  21. Molm, L. D., "Coercive power in social change", NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570919
  22. Crozier, M., Friedberg, E., "Actor and systems: The Politics of Collective Action", Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  23. 이규만, "조직구성원의 정치지각이 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 기업경영연구, 제13권 제1호, pp.97-110, 2006.
  24. 신유근, "한국의 경영: 그 현상과 전망", 서울: 박영사, 1992.
  25. 엄유경, "조직정치가 지식공유에 미치는 영향: 교사의 조직정치지각과 정치적 기술을 중심으로", 한국인력개발학회, 제16권 제1호, pp. 207-230, 2014.
  26. Poon, J., "Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics perceptions", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 18, pp. 138-155, 2003.https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940310465036
  27. Robbins, S. P., "Organizational behavior", Pearson Education, Inc., 2005.
  28. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M., "Relationship-based approach to leadership, development of leader-member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multilevel multi-domain perspective", Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 219-247, 1995.https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  29. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M., "Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development", Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 43-72, 1998.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
  30. Maslyn, John & Uhl-Bien, Mary, "Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality", The Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 697-708, 2001.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697PMid:11519653
  31. Chen, G., & Klimoski, R. J., "The impact of expectations on newcomer performance in teams as mediated by work characteristics, social exchanges, and empowerment", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 591-607, 2003.https://doi.org/10.5465/30040651
  32. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M., "The Transformation of Professionals into Self-Managing and Partially Self-Designing Contributors: Toward a Theory of Leadership-Making", Journal of Management Systems, 3, pp. 25-39, 1991.
  33. Gouldner, A. W., "The norm of reciprocity: A Preliminary statement", American Sociological Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, 161-178, 1996.https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
  34. Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M. S., "Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review", Journal of Management, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 874-900, 2005.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  35. 박지환, "상사-부하 조절초점 부합도가 LMX 및 부하성과에 미치는 영향: 리더십 스타일 및 과업유형의 조절효과를 중심으로", 고려대학교 대학원, 박사학위 논문, 2013.
  36. Coyle-Shapiro, Jacqueline & Shore, Lynn, "The Employee-Organization Relationship: Where Do We Go from Here?", Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 166-179, 2007.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008
  37. March, J. G., & Simmon, H. A., "Organizations", New York, 1958.
  38. Drory, A. & Romm, T., "The definition of organizational politics: A review", Human Relations, Vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 1133-1154, 1990.https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679004301106
  39. Randall, Marjorie & Cropanzano, Russell & Bormann, Carol & Birjulin, Andrej, "Organizational Politics and Organizational support as predictors of Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 159-174, 1999.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199903)20:2<159::AID-JOB881>3.0.CO;2-7
  40. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E., "The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 590-598, 2002.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.590PMid:12090617
  41. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C., "Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange and employees reciprocity", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 219-227, 1996.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219
  42. Duchon, D., Green, S. G., & Taber, T. D., "Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, pp. 56-60, 1986.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.56
  43. Gerstner, C. R. & Day, David, "Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 827-844, 1997.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
  44. Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C., "Social exchange in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory", In Neider, L. L. & Schriesheim, Cchri (Eds). Leadership, InfAge, Greenwich, CT, pp. 65-114, 2002.
  45. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D. & Chen, Z. X., "Leader-member exchanges as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 420-432, 2005.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407908
  46. Kozlowski, S. W., & Doherty, M. L., "Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 546-553, 1989.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.546
  47. Hackett, R. D., Faith, J., Song, L. J., & Lapierre, L. M., "LMX and organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the links within and across Western and Chinese samples", In G. B. Graen (Ed.), Dealing with diversity, A volume in LMX leadership: The series, pp. 219-264, 2003.
  48. Larry J. Williams. & Stella E. Anderson, "Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 601-617, 1991.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
  49. Kacmar, K. M., Bozeman, D. P., Carlson, D. S., & Anthony, W. P., "An examination of the perception of organizational politics model: Replication and extension", Human Relations, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 383-416, 1999.https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200305
  50. Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S., "Further validation of the Perception of Politics Scale (POPs): A multiple sample investigation", Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 627-658, 1997.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300502
Information
  • Publisher :The Society of Convergence Knowledge
  • Publisher(Ko) :융복합지식학회
  • Journal Title :The Society of Convergence Knowledge Transactions
  • Journal Title(Ko) :융복합지식학회논문지
  • Volume : 9
  • No :2
  • Pages :127-143