All Issue

2026 Vol.14, Issue 2 Preview Page

Research Article

30 June 2026. pp. 89-101
Abstract
기후변화의 심화와 인공지능 기술의 급속한 발전은 비서구 건축문화유산 보존에 새로운 전기를 마련했다. 본 논문은 AI 보존 시스템의 성능 실증보다는, 그 설계 구조와 적용 방안을 개념적으로 정리하는 데 초점을 둔다. 인도 타지마할을 사례로 삼아, 데이터 수집·분석·의사결정의 3단계 구조를 제안하였다. 수집 단계에서는 위성, 드론(UAV), 사물인터넷(IoT) 자료를 통합 활용한다. 분석 단계에서는 U-Net, YOLO, Mask R-CNN 등 다양한 딥러닝 모델을 적용한다. 의사결정 단계는 디지털 트윈을 기반으로 한다. 이와 함께 복합 위협 매트릭스, 무갈·이슬람·인도 건축 맥락을 반영한 설계 사례, 탈식민주의 관점의 AI 편향 완화 전략도 제시한다. 그리고 현장 연구로 이어지는 5단계 검증 로드맵도 함께 수록한다.
The intensification of climate change and the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have created new opportunities for the preservation of non-Western architectural heritage. Rather than empirically validating the performance of AI-based conservation systems, this study focuses on conceptually organizing their design framework and potential applications. Using the Taj Mahal in India as a case study, the paper proposes a three-stage architecture consisting of data collection, analysis, and decision-making. In the data collection stage, satellite imagery, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and Internet of Things (IoT) data are integrated. In the analysis stage, various deep learning models, including U-Net, YOLO, and Mask R-CNN, are employed to detect and assess heritage deterioration. The decision-making stage is built upon a digital twin framework that supports predictive conservation and management. In addition, the study presents a multi-threat matrix, design scenarios that reflect the Mughal, Islamic, and Indian architectural context, and AI bias mitigation strategies informed by postcolonial perspectives. Finally, a five-stage validation roadmap is proposed to facilitate future field-based research and practical implementation.
References
  1. M. Casillo, F. Colace, R. Gaeta, A. Lorusso, and M. Pellegrino, “Artificial intelligence in archaeological site conservation: Trends, challenges, and future directions”, Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 224-241, 2025. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.207

    10.5334/jcaa.207
  2. M. Paolanti, E. Frontoni, and R. Pierdicca, “Towards trustworthy AI in cultural heritage”, npj Heritage Science, Vol. 14, Article no. 131, 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s40494-026-02403-z

    10.1038/s40494-026-02403-z
  3. V. Barrile, C. Gattuso, and E. Genovese, “Review of geomatics solutions for protecting cultural heritage in response to climate change”, Heritage, Vol. 7, No. 12, pp. 7031-7049, 2024. DOI:10.3390/heritage7120325

    10.3390/heritage7120325
  4. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), Conservation and Preservation of Taj Mahal: Annual Report 2022-2023, Ministry of Culture, Government of India, 2023. https://www.indiaculture.gov.in/sites/default/files/annual-reports/Final_Min_of_Culture_Eng_AR_for_Net_14-09-23_18092023.pdf

  5. UNESCO World Heritage Committee, “State of conservation reports: Taj Mahal (India),” World Heritage List No. 252. https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/

  6. I. Karadag, “Machine learning for conservation of architectural heritage”, Open House International, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 23-37, 2022. DOI:10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0124

    10.1108/OHI-05-2022-0124
  7. R. Sizyakin, J. Cornelis, L. Meeus, and L. Platisa, “Crack detection in paintings using convolutional neural networks”, IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 74535-74552, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988856

    10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988856
  8. C. Koch, K. Georgieva, V. Kasireddy, B. Akinci, and P. Fieguth, “A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 196-210, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008

    10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008
  9. A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 75-105, 2004. DOI: 10.2307/25148625

    10.2307/25148625
  10. M.T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Why should I trust you?: Explaining the predictions of any classifier”, Proc. ACM SIGKDD, pp. 1135-1144, 2016. DOI: 10.1145/2939672.2939778

    10.1145/2939672.2939778
  11. A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines”, Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 1, pp. 389-399, 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

    10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  12. Y. Zhang, C. Li, F. Chen, and Y. Cen, “Crack segmentation on earthen heritage site surfaces” , Applied Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 24, p. 12830, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/app122412830

    10.3390/app122412830
  13. H. Richards-Rissetto, D. Newton, and A. Al Zadjali, “A 3D point cloud deep learning approach using LiDAR to identify ancient Maya archaeological sites”, ISPRS Annals, Vol. VIII-M-1-2021, pp. 133-139, 2021. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-VIII-M-1-2021-133-2021

    10.5194/isprs-annals-VIII-M-1-2021-133-2021
  14. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation”, Proc. MICCAI 2015, LNCS 9351, pp. 234-241, 2015. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597

    10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597
  15. K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, “Mask R-CNN,” Proc. ICCV, pp. 2961-2969, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.322

    10.1109/ICCV.2017.322
  16. Z. Q. Wu, and L. Fuxin, “PointConv: Deep convolutional networks on 3D point clouds”, Proc. CVPR, pp. 9621-9630, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00985

    10.1109/CVPR.2019.00985
  17. J. Redmon, and I. Farhadi, “YOLOv3: An incremental improvement”, Proc. ICCV, pp. 1-12, 2018. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767

    10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767
  18. G. Jocher, A. Chaurasia, and J. Qiu, YOLOv5 by Ultralytics (Version 7.0) [Software], Zenodo, 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7347926

    10.5281/zenodo.7347926
  19. M. Mishra, T. Barman, and G. V. Ramana, “Artificial intelligence-based visual inspection system for structural health monitoring of cultural heritage”, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 14, pp. 103-120, 2024. DOI:10.1007/s13349-022-00643-8

    10.1007/s13349-022-00643-8
  20. G. Imen, M. Hamdi, M. Zoubeida, and B. Fouad, “Utilizing the MaxEnt machine learning model to forecast urban heritage sites in the desert regions of southwestern Algeria”, Archaeological Prospection, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 23-35, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/arp.1923

    10.1002/arp.1923
  21. N. Masini, M. Biscione, M. Ciminale, and R. Lasaponara, “Revealing the structural behaviour of Brunelleschi’s Dome with machine learning techniques”, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 38, pp. 1440-1465, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10618-024-01004-3

    10.1007/s10618-024-01004-3
  22. M. Altaweel, Khelifi, and M. M. Shana’ah, “Monitoring Looting at Cultural Heritage Sites: Applying Deep Learning on Optical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Data as a Solution”, Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 480-495, 2023. DOI: 10.1177/08944393231188471

    10.1177/08944393231188471
Information
  • Publisher :The Society of Convergence Knowledge
  • Publisher(Ko) :융복합지식학회
  • Journal Title :The Society of Convergence Knowledge Transactions
  • Journal Title(Ko) :융복합지식학회논문지
  • Volume : 14
  • No :2
  • Pages :89-101